Spitzer: 1, Grasso: 0.

grasso.jpgEliot Spitzer won the first substantive round in the New York Attorney General’s lawsuit against former NYSE head Richard Grasso today. State Supreme Court Justice Charles Ramos ruled that Grasso must return part of $58 million in “deferred compensation” he received as part of his controversial $198 million compensation package from the then exchange.

Ramos also shot down Grasso’s claims for damages against the exchange and a defamation claim against the current NYSE chairman.

Of course, all of this is at the summary judgment stage, and open to appeal at some point. And you know Grasso’s not exactly opposed to appealing Ramos’ judgments. He’s already got three in front of the state appeals court.
(And, by the way, in New York the “State Supreme Court” is actually the lower court. It makes them lower court judges feel better if they get to call themselves Supreme.)

The opinion hasn't yet been published but we probably won't read it even when it is. Unless, you know, there are some juicy, mean or funny bits.

Grasso Must Return Part of $190 Million Pay Package, Judge Says [Bloomberg]

Comments

Posted by John Thorzeine, Oct 19, 2006 5:03PM

Smart money says it is overturned on appeal. Spitzer overplayed his hadn. The judge has to conflicts of interest and should have recused himself.

Posted by El Segundo, Oct 19, 2006 5:27PM

Sure, no one bats an eyelash when idiotic basketball, football, and baseball players get paid millions, but somehow Grasso's millions are wrong???!

Posted by bizwriter, Oct 20, 2006 8:27AM

El Idioto -- in professional sports there's a free, transparent market for labor. Grasso, on the other hand, made himself out for compensation purposes to be equal to the CEOs of much bigger, more complex and difficult-to-manage Wall Street firms like Goldman, Morgan Stanley and Merrill — and somehow got away with it. That's like a practice-squad player saying he should get LeBron money. It would never happen in the NBA, but it happened on Wall Street. Fact was his NYSE had far fewer employees, revenues, wasn't for-profit. He was a ward heeler, not a business genius. Whether he misled the board or not, he didn't deserve to get paid that much. I mean, it's really laughable when you think about it.

Post Your Comment