We're pretty sure that Emily Oster is more than just a set of nice eyes and a pretty smile. But we can't get over how every time we hear about her someone mentions that she's a hottie. Yesterday's New York Times story follows the typical pattern: mention her youth, her marital status (she married the boyfriend who helped her come up with her PhD thesis), and talk about how popular she is. It's probably no good to directly mention her looks, so better to simply run the photo.
But we're not the New York Times, and so we'll ask the question directly: is Emily Oster genuinely hot or just, you know, economist hot?
The Future of Economics Isn’t So Dismal [New York Times]



Posted by vespa, Jan 11, 2007 11:44AM
i guess she could get to hot but it looks like she is in desperate need of a makeover. is it really that hard to go to a descent stylist and put on some makeup in the morning? (i'd comment on her clothes but you didn't provide a full body shot) if you can find one that would be great.